Re: Publishing Contract
Recovered from the Internet Archive. This page comes from a ListenSmart.com capture saved by the Wayback Machine on October 5, 2000. The original text is preserved where it survives; links and layout have been adapted for this restoration. Historical account, search, posting, voting, playback and download features are inactive; their labels remain as plain text. Images that were never archived are left out. Audio files were not recovered for this archive.
Source: Wayback Machine capture of ubb.listensmart.com:80/ubb/Forum12/HTML/001373.html.
Removal requests: email seanfenlon@yahoo.com with the page address.
Email This Page to Someone! |
 Artist Only Boards [all categories]
 Artist Area
 Re: Publishing Contract
Post New Topic |
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Re: Publishing Contract |
| #1
ben_fenlon Administrator Posts: 212 |
posted 05-22-2000 12:23 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for ben_fenlon  Edit/Delete Message 
First, I'd like to thank everyone for your feedback on the publishing contracts thus far. We understand that absorbing and understanding a contract can be a challenging task. To recap, we'll be compiling all of the comments and questions and posting answers to these questions on the boards for the benefit of everyone to see. Answers to this first wave of feedback should be available by the end of this week. Rest assured, due to the significance of the contract, we do not plan to "rush" through the process. Rather, as Sean stated, we'll do our best to make sure every question is answered accurately and directly. In the mean time, we're seeking and encouraging as many artists as possible to comment on the contracts. Thanks again for your feedback. -Ben ------------------ IP: Logged |
| #2
RhythmStar Guru Posts: 241 |
posted 05-22-2000 02:33 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for RhythmStar Edit/Delete Message
Great news! I'll be sure to post the results of our attorney's eval here. Since even professionals are allowed to disagree on the finer points of legalese, hopefully a broad range of feedback will help all of us in the long run. RS ------------------ IP: Logged |
| #3
pmarinovich Guru Posts: 311 |
posted 05-22-2000 02:38 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for pmarinovich Edit/Delete Message
This is the way it should be done. Bill, thanks in advance for posting the evaluation when it comes. ------------------ IP: Logged |
| #4
RhythmStar Guru Posts: 241 |
posted 05-22-2000 08:26 PM
Click Here to See the Profile for RhythmStar Edit/Delete Message
No problemo, Pete! BTW, please feel free to come on over to the MU discussion group and add your 2 bits to the debate. Votes are based on the sentiment of the voting population. If you want to make sure your POV is heard, no one can speak it better than you! musiciansunited-subscribe@egroups.com FWIW, my standing offer to all Art-To-Heart artists to be sponsored into MU as voting members on my dime still stands. So, it's really about interest, not collecting dues. I still listen to Benvindo all the time. RS ------------------ IP: Logged |
| #5
Andrew Hickey Guru Posts: 337 |
posted 05-24-2000 04:42 AM
Click Here to See the Profile for Andrew Hickey Edit/Delete Message
just boinking the threads worth reading to get it above the other drivel... ------------------ IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Post New Topic  |
Hop to: Go |
Contact Us | ListenSmart.com
Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.41a
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.